Last updated on

CLINIC joined partner organizations in filing an amicus brief in Matter of A-M-R-C-, an asylum case that the attorney general certified to himself for possible termination nearly 13 years after the applicant won asylum. The brief focuses on the importance of finality in asylum grants and the chilling effect a decision allowing reopening after more than a decade would have on all asylees.

Last updated on

CLINIC co-authored an amicus brief seeking rehearing in Scarlett v. Barr, a Second Circuit decision that makes it more difficult for asylum seekers to win in cases involving persecution by non-government actors.

Last updated on

CLINIC joined an amicus brief in support of plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction in Casa de Maryland v. Wolf, a case challenging the new asylum EAD rules.

Last updated on

CLINIC joined an amicus brief in Bollat Vasques v. Wolf, a First Circuit case in which five families are challenging the government subjecting them to the so-called Migrant Protection Protocols.

Last updated on

CLINIC filed an amicus brief in Martinez Castro v. Barr, challenging Matter of A-B- and Matter of L-E-A-.

Last updated on

CLINIC, and nine other non-profit partners, filed an amicus brief in Benitez v. Barr, a case in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals challenging the attorney general’s decision in Matter of Castro-Tum 27 I&N Dec. 271 (A.G. 2018) that stripped immigration court judges of their authority to administratively close cases.

Last updated on

CLINIC filed an amicus brief in the De Pena-Paniagua v. Barr case in the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit arguing that restrictions on asylum for victims of private actor harm could harm those seeking asylum on religious grounds. In a decision critical of Matter of A-B-, the First Circuit granted the petition for review, allowing Ms. De Pena to pursue her domestic violence-based asylum claim.

Last updated on

CLINIC joined the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and other Christian organizations in an amicus brief before the U.S. Supreme Court urging the Court to not allow the administration to rescind DACA. The brief focuses on the arbitrariness of the decision to rescind DACA as well as the catastrophic effect the rescission will have on families.

Last updated on

CLINIC, together with 10 other nonprofit organizations that serve immigrant children, filed an amicus brief with the Ninth Circuit in defense of critical protections for minors detained by the federal government pending their immigration proceedings.

Last updated on

The Mercer Law School Immigration Appeals Clinic filed an amicus brief on CLINIC’s behalf on March 11, 2020. The amicus brief lays out how the particular social group of “Honduran transgender women” meets the three-prong test laid out in Matter of M-E-V-G-.

Update: After submission of this, and other amicus briefs, the Department of Homeland Security stipulated to remand the case to the immigration judge.

Last updated on

The Board of Immigration Appeals, issued calls for amicus briefs in two cases where the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) appealed immigration judges’ decisions to terminate cases, where the Notices to Appear did not specify the admission status of the respondents.

Last updated on

The Recognition & Accreditation, or R&A, program governs how nonprofit organizations provide charitable immigration legal services. Nonprofits that meet certain requirements apply for recognition, and non-attorney staff members may apply for accreditation after completing rigorous training focused on immigration law. Accredited individuals can help clients with immigration matters before government agencies, including U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and the asylum office. Certain accredited representatives may represent clients in immigration court.

Last updated on

Asylum can be granted to noncitizens if they have a well-founded fear of persecution on account of their membership in a particular social group. But in recent years the Board of Immigration Appeals and the Attorney General have imposed increasingly complex requirements for proving a “social group.” In 2018, the Board of Immigration Appeals announced a policy that asylum applicants must give the Immigration Judge an “exact delineation” of the particular social group that their case is based on.

Last updated on

CLINIC joined with 17 other organizations that serve asylum seekers to urge the Ninth Circuit to uphold a preliminary injunction in favor of asylum seekers affected by Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP) so-called “metering” policy.

Last updated on

Represented by O’Melveny and Myers, LLP, CLINIC and twenty other faith-based organizations, including other Catholic groups, protestant groups, Jewish groups, and Muslim groups, have filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to strike down a federal criminal law that could lead to prosecutions for faith-related speech.

Last updated on

In response to the June 9, 2016 amicus invitation by the Board of Immigration Appeals on the definition of a minor for purposes of the asylum one-year filing deadline, CLINIC and Public Counsel submitted this briefing arguing that a minor should be defined as youth under 21.   

Last updated on

The Catholic Legal Immigration Network Inc., filed an amicus brief April 27 challenging Attorney General Jeff Sessions’ effort to insert himself into a settled immigration case, the Matter of A-B. The attorney general’s unusual move could result in changes to long-settled immigration policy, making it harder for many asylum seekers -- notably those fleeing religion-based persecution – to obtain protection in the United States.

Last updated on

CLINIC has joined with Muslim Advocates and other faith partners as Amici Curiae, or friends of the court, in the Texas. v. Nielsen case challenging the constitutionality of the DACA program. The brief asks the court to deny Texas’s motion for preliminary injunction which would halt adjudication of all DACA cases. The case is scheduled to be heard in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas on August 8, 2018.

Last updated on

CLINIC, along with Public Counsel, filed this amicus brief on March 7, 2016 in Doe v. Sessions before the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. This brief provided the court with a framework, drawn from our experience working with young asylum-seekers, to decide whether the coerced actions of a child can trigger the "serious nonpolitical crime" bar to asylum.

Last updated on

Gibson, Dunn, and Crutcher, LLP, represented CLINIC on an amicus brief in support of the plaintiffs-appellees in Inland Empire – Immigrant Youth Collective, et al., v. Kirstjen Nielsen, et al. The plaintiffs-appellees challenge the government’s unlawful termination of their DACA without process on behalf of a class of DACA recipients.

Last updated on

On July 31, 2019, CLINIC joined eight other organizations that serve survivors of gender-based violence to submit an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C.

Last updated on

Attorney General Sessions requested briefing from amici in the case of Matter of Castro-Tum, 27 I&N Dec. 187 (A.G. 2018).  In response to this request, CLINIC and Matthew Hoppock filed this amicus brief on February 16, 2018.