CLINIC submitted a public comment on December 22, 2023, concerning the new proposed changes to Form I-864 – I-864, Affidavit of Support Under Section 213A of the INA; I-864A, Contract Between Sponsor and Household Member

CLINIC submitted a public comment on Nov. 7, 2023, concerning the new proposed changes to Form I-485 – Application to Register Permanent Residence or Adjust Status.

The Supreme Court’s decision in Sanchez v. Maryokas and recent changes to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, or USCIS, policy have made it increasingly difficult for many TPS beneficiaries who initially entered the United States without inspection to adjust status through family-based petitions. This practice advisory reviews these developments as well as options for adjustment that may be available to help certain TPS beneficiaries adjust status, even if they initially entered the United States without inspection.

The Supreme Court held that federal courts cannot review factual findings underlying the denial of the following forms of relief from removal: cancellation of removal, voluntary departure, adjustment of status, 212(i) waivers and 212(h) waivers.

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) held that immigration judges may inquire into the bona fides of a marriage when adjudicating an application for adjustment of status, even though the underlying I-130 petition had been approved by USCIS. The BIA also held that a complete and accurate transcript of proceedings is essential in order to adjudicate an appeal that turns on the credibility of witness testimony.

Under new Department of Homeland Security and Department of State regulations, having health insurance is a positive factor in determining whether an adjustment of status or immigrant visa applicant is likely to become a public charge. This resource reviews the types of health insurance that may be available to intending immigrants, how each type of insurance is viewed by DHS and DOS, and the types of documentation that must be submitted to show enrollment or future enrollment in a health insurance policy.

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently amended its Policy Manual to confirm that conditional resident status “terminates” when the agency issues a formal notice to that effect. This resource offers needed clarifications on the change.

USCIS has issued new guidance on submission of medical examinations (Form I-693), effective November 1, 2018. Under the new guidance, medical examinations submitted on or after November 1, 2018 must have been signed by the civil surgeon within 60 days of submission. Once submitted, they will be valid for two years from the date of civil surgeon signature. 

Asylees are able to adjust status after one year from the grant of asylum status pursuant to INA §209(b). But what happens to that asylum status after adjustment? The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) recently answered that question where it held that after an asylum seeker adjusts status to become a lawful permanent resident, the prior asylum status has “terminated.” Matter of N-A-I-, 27 I&N Dec. 72 (BIA 2017).

Enacted in 1966, the Cuban Adjustment Act (CAA) allows Cubans and their spouses and children to become permanent residents through adjustment of status. The law provides humanitarian relief to Cubans who are presumed to be political refugees and cannot seek residence through other avenues. To qualify for Cuban adjustment as a principal applicant, one must be a native or citizen of Cuba; have been inspected, admitted or paroled; be physically present in the United States for more than one year; and be admissible to the United States for lawful permanent residency.

The October Visa Bulletin contains an important change in the timing of when family- and employment-based immigrant visa applicants can apply for adjustment of status.

In a recent decision the Board of Immigration Appeals held that after-acquired derivatives are not eligible to be considered “grandfathered” for purposes of eligibility for section 245(i) adjustment of status. Matter of Estrada, 26 I&N Dec. 180 (BIA 2013).  This decision clarifies but is consistent with prior USCIS memos interpreting this provision.