Garland v. Ming Dai, 141 S. Ct. 1669 (2021), and a Deep Dive into Credibility in Asylum Cases
The Supreme Court recently addressed the legal standard for reviewing asylum credibility findings on appeal in the decision Garland v. Ming Dai, 141 S. Ct. 1669 (2021). This webinar will discuss the holding and significance of that decision. It will also take a deep dive into other precedent and guidance on how adjudicators determine credibility, and how that determination is reviewed on appeal. The speakers will also offer practical tips on how to present asylum claims to minimize the risk of adverse credibility findings, including a discussion on corroboration and common pitfalls to avoid.
The recorded version of this webinar will not be provided. Be sure to join us live!
NOTE: This webinar takes place in Eastern Standard Time.
Additional Information
CLE for Attorney Participants
CLINIC is authorized by the State Bar of California to provide minimum continuing legal education (MCLE) training. If you are an attorney licensed in California, you may seek 1.50 hours of MCLE self-study credits per webinar. If you are an attorney licensed in another state, please check with your state bar to determine whether this training qualifies for MCLE credit.
