Click on the PDF icon to the right to view the attachment.
On April 25, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Arizona v. United States, a case involving the legal challenge to Arizona's restrictive state immigration enforcement law "SB 1070." The U.S.
April 24, 2012
Join us for Part 4 in a four part series for a presentation of tech innovations within the CLINIC network. We'll learn about CitizenshipWorks, a program designed to assist local programs in helping clients naturalize. We'll also learn from several network affiliates about innovative ways they've used technology in their offices and how it has impacted the way they reach the public. Leya Speasmaker, Field Support Coordinator in CLINIC's Washington DC office moderates the discussion.
CLINIC and LawLogix (LLX) have entered into an exclusive agreement whereby CLINIC will singularly promote LLX’s web-based, immigration case management system EDGEtm and LLX will provide its system to CLINIC affiliates (members and subscribers) at a reduced price. This price would include special training opportunities. CLINIC’s Religious Immigration Services Section uses EDGEtm successfully to manage its caseload of over 1,000 cases. Over 45 CLINIC affiliates, almost 25 percent of the network, uses EDGEtm and the number grows each month. LawLogix is the only immigration case management
By Jennie Guilfoyle
On April 12, 2012 the Board of Immigration Appeals issued a precedent decision, Matter of D-K- (25 I&N Dec. 761 (BIA 2012)) holding that unadjusted refugees who are put into removal proceedings should be charged under the grounds of deportability at INA § 237, not under the grounds of inadmissibility at INA § 212. The Board also held that refugees may be put into proceedings without a prior finding of inadmissibility by USCIS.